On 03:06:34 wrote Stan Hoeppner: > On 4/10/2012 9:36 AM, Volker Lendecke wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 08:55:14AM -0500, Chris Weiss wrote: > >> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 8:53 AM, Volker Lendecke > >> > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 08:26:48AM -0500, Chris Weiss wrote: > >>>> that's dramatic! what needs done (from a user POV) to get this > >>>> backported into Stable distro kernels? suggestions? > >>> > >>> Wait until the next major releases pick it up. > >> > >> that's a really crappy option. in certain cases that > >> could be 4 years from now. > > > > Well, if you are an important enough RH customer you might > > be able to apply pressure. But that's a LOT of money > > probably. Same for SuSE. Debian will likely be very > > resistant against that kind of bribery^Wincentive. > > Debian already has 3.2.6 available in the stable repo: > > $ aptitude search linux-image > ... > i linux-image-3.2.6 - Linux kernel, version 3.2.6 > ... I don't know what is in your sources.list
According to packages.debian.org that's not true :-) . There is kernel 3.2.0 in backports, that's all, as usual. http://packages.debian.org/search?suite=all&arch=any&searchon=names&keywords=linux-image-3.2 Perhaps this site is not up to date ;-) -- Regards Harry Jede -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
