On 29/04/12 09:09, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On Sat, 2012-04-28 at 12:31 +0200, steve wrote:
Hi
How about calling s3fs, s4fs?
Cheers,
Steve
Steve,
The 's3fs' proposal you refer to is documented at
https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4/s3fs
In terms of a codename s4fs, that would imply a DC based on the ntvfs
file server, which is what we have agreed to change to be the
non-default option.
I hope this clarifies things,
Hi Andrew, hi everyone.
Thanks. That clarifies a lot. As the only English speaking member of our
team it is difficult to explain this stuff. The locals here seem to want
new stuff, if only by name.
Cheers,
Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
