Just my $.02 If you plan on using winbind/ACL's XFS would be the recommended filesytem.
On Thu, 2003-01-09 at 13:46, Gordon Pritchard wrote: > So - > > Out of all of this "slow performance with lots of files" discussion, > what would be the recommended filesystem? I'm about to implement a > RAID-3 Samba-server for rich-media (multimedia), and I'd like (robust) > journalling, along with speed. I have used (and am using) XFS, > ReiserFS, ext2 and ext3, but not on any sort of server. AFAICT, they > all seem to "work". > > But I've only verified that ext3 survives "dog pulling out power-cord > in the middle of disk-writes" :-O :-) > > The server will basically be RedHat 8.0, and I will be compiling custom > kernels (so I can add whatever file-system-support is available for > Linux...). Again, I'm after robustness and speed. Ease of > implementation is low on the scale... (I don't mind pain :-) ) > > TIA, > -Gord > > > -- > Gordon Pritchard, P.Eng. | Institute of Electrical and > Research Labs Manager | Electronics Engineers > Simon Fraser University, Surrey | Quarter Century Wireless Ass'n > [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Telephone Pioneers of America > phone: 604.586.6186 > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- Ken Schneider Senior UNIX Administrator Network Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
