On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 03:18:02PM +0100, S.Kirk wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, 30 Apr 2012, Kirk S. wrote: > > >Morning list, > > > ><--snip --> > > > >>We have not tried the version of Samba currenlty shipping with > >>Solaris - we've found a lot of problems with it in the past > >>integrating with AD. As it currently stands, single sign-on > >>works but there is a CNAME that the clients are pointing to > >>which doesn't seem optimal but does work. I take it you're using > >>the version shipped with Solaris - update 10 to 3.5.10 I guess? > > > ><--snip--> > > > >In a further update to this problem, I have migrated the CNAME to > >another server that we have standing in for the 'faulty' instance. > >This server was previously working fairly well (although SMF had > >restarted samba at least once due to the parent smbd process > >crashing but no core file was produced) and was not generating > >large numbers of error message regarding locking mutex.tdb. > > > >Now I have migrated the CNAME, we have huge numbers of errors on > >the temporary server. > > A minor change of deleting the CNAME and replacing it with an A > record that points at the same IP as the server uses as it's primary > interface (wthout removing the existing A record for hostname or > modifying the PTR record) seems to have resolved the huge numbers of > errors locking mutex.tdb and the associated performance problems we > were experiencing. > > It doesn't sound like anyone else is experiencing this so I assume > the only thing to do is to file a bug report? I've not tried 3.6.5 > yet but I see it has been packaged by OpenCSW a few days ago so I > may be able to try it on a test machine.
Yes, that would be very helpful - thanks ! Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
