On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 11:31:51AM -0400, [email protected] wrote:
> So it looks like CYGWIN is deciding to
> invoke some oddball i-node fabrication
> when a file is located on a CIFS share
> and actually use the NTFS value when it's
> NTFS.  Maybe the logic is designed to
> support the FAT32 scenario and they
> never accounted for CIFS.
> 
> The 'IndexNumber: 0x81f' valued returned by
> Samba is the actual i-node value.
> 
> I might post a report to CYGWIN on this
> and see what they say.
> 
> Thanks for the help!

Aha ! Not our bug :-). Thanks !!! :-).
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba

Reply via email to