El 23/07/12 10:46, Horacio Lo Brutto escribió:
Yes, in fact that was one of the things I haven't mentioned. We're
going with either to physical servers (nice ones) or with Blades +
VMWare ESXi. We will build a redundant pair of servers.
I am a little concerned about the amount of users / machines, and
therefore GPOs that would need to be configured / applied in order to
support such network.
The only consideration of GPO scalability is that GPOs are shared
objects on a folder, so you have to secure the availability to the
workstations.
I am interested in more details regarding the ACL issues you have.
What kind of issues you see?
The default Linux mount options could not support store windows file ACL
attributes. There are recomended file systems for that task like XFS.
Regarding the linux permissions / file system. are you working with
Samba as the file server as well ? (the files resides on a linux box?,
that's what I mean)
Syncing the groups that you create inside Active Directory with the ACL
stored would be easy or sometimes a tricky task. You could search the
forum about this.
Thanks a lot!
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 12:35 PM, German Molano <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Horacio
I had a Samba4 (4.0.0beta2-GIT) installation in production, with
40 something workstations with WinXP, Vista y 7 and a couple
servers with windows 2008 and 2003 server. To this time it had
worked pretty fine, i only have some issues related with ACL, some
of them more related with mixed permissions on Linux filesystem.
We use GPO to control some windows features at workstation level
and the WSUS policies it works as expected. On your enviroment i
think that should consider some kind redundancy, maybe a slave DC.
German Molano
El 23/07/12 10:13, Horacio Lo Brutto escribió:
We're involved in a project that the requirements could be
satisfied
with both samba3 and 4. Anyway I am testing what can be done with
Samba4 and after following the tutorial published in the official
wiki, I was able to create my test domain, and join WinXP and Win7
machines to it without a problem.
I still need to test the GPO functionality, and some other
stuff, but
before continuing with that testing, I would like to as you,
what do
you thing about using samba4 in a network with about 700 computers
(mixed between WinXP, Vista, 7 and 2000) and about the same
amount of
users.
Will it be stable enough? can I 'trust' samba for such network?
Thanks a lot in advance!
--
Horacio Agustin Lo Brutto
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
Rondeau 2575 | Distrito Tecnológico | C.A.B.A – Argentina
Móvil: 54 9 11 6105 3898 | Tel. 54 11 4942 6877
www.issecurity.com.ar <http://www.issecurity.com.ar>
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
--
*Descripción: Descripción: Descripción: IS_mail_sign*
*Horacio Agustin Lo Brutto
*[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>_
Rondeau 2575 | Distrito Tecnológico | C.A.B.A – Argentina
Móvil: 54 9 11 6105 3898 | Tel. 54 11 4942 6877
www.issecurity.com.ar <http://www.issecurity.com.ar/>
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
