On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 10:58:08PM +0000, Benjamin Huntsman wrote:
> As a further follow-up, here's an example, from source3/utils/net_cache.c:
>
> d_printf(_("Key: %s\t Timeout: %s\t Value: %s %s\n"), keystr,
> timeout_str, datastr, timeout > now_t ? "": _("(expired)"));
>
> My C skills aren't good enough to understand what's being done here, but the
> offending bit is the last argument to d_printf:
>
> timeout > now_t ? "": _("(expired)")
>
> Is there a way we can re-write this in more compatible way?
>
> Apparently, this construction is supposed to look like:
>
> (condition) ? (t_result) : (f_result)
>
> and t_result and f_result must be of the same type. So do I read that "" is
> a char, and _("(expired)") is an int? Something like:
>
> timeout > now_t ? atoi(""):_("(expired)") maybe?
>
> Again, just grasping here...
> ... or maybe there's a flag to XLC to let us get by this?
No, both "" and _("(expired)") should evaluate to a const char *.
Looks like the error is that _("xxxx") isn't evaluating to a string
on AIX with xlc.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
