Am Montag, 21. Januar 2013, 22:27:44 schrieb Benjamin Huntsman: > The problem seems to be when 'security = SHARE' is set. It works just fine > when 'security = USER'. Seeing as 4.0 removed the option to set SHARE, I > guess it's moot for that release... > > Unfortunate, but what can be done... > > -Ben
the setting "security = share" is deprecated for a long time already - now in 4.0 it has been removed. But the same "anonymous guest" access can be achieved with "security = user" plus some additional lines ... (also in samba-3.6.x). See https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Public_Samba_Server Cheers, Günter > ________________________________________ > From: Chris Smith [[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, January 21, 2013 1:19 PM > To: Benjamin Huntsman > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba 3.6.10 not reading groups > > Might be related to my bug: > https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9561 > > Unfortunately I'm not getting any traction on it. From my testing > there still hasn't, after 10 releases, been a fully usable 3.6.x and > now it's claimed to be in "maintenance mode" due to the release of > Samba 4.x, which I guess must not have any major issues. > > On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Benjamin Huntsman > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > It isn't honoring groups specified in the valid users clause of the share > > configuration. I'm running in security = SHARE mode, and user > > authentication is working just fine. Even if I specify individual users > > on the valid users = line, it works. Just not groups. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
