On Wed, 2013-02-20 at 10:53 +0000, Alex Matthews wrote: > Hiya, > > I am also having problems with this. > > When samba starts I get tsig verify failures: > > [2013/02/20 10:49:05, 0] ../source4/smbd/server.c:369(binary_smbd_main) > samba version 4.0.3 started. > Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1992-2012 > [2013/02/20 10:49:06, 0] ../source4/smbd/server.c:475(binary_smbd_main) > samba: using 'standard' process model > [2013/02/20 10:49:07, 0] > ../lib/util/util_runcmd.c:334(samba_runcmd_io_handler) > /usr/sbin/samba_dnsupdate: ; TSIG error with server: tsig verify failure > [2013/02/20 10:49:07, 0] > ../lib/util/util_runcmd.c:334(samba_runcmd_io_handler) > /usr/sbin/samba_dnsupdate: ; TSIG error with server: tsig verify failure > [2013/02/20 10:49:07, 0] > ../lib/util/util_runcmd.c:334(samba_runcmd_io_handler) > /usr/sbin/samba_dnsupdate: ; TSIG error with server: tsig verify failure > [2013/02/20 10:49:07, 0] > ../lib/util/util_runcmd.c:334(samba_runcmd_io_handler) > /usr/sbin/samba_dnsupdate: ; TSIG error with server: tsig verify failure > [2013/02/20 10:49:07, 0] > ../lib/util/util_runcmd.c:334(samba_runcmd_io_handler) > /usr/sbin/samba_dnsupdate: ; TSIG error with server: tsig verify failure > > log level 3 = http://pastebin.com/ZJQR6hiJ > > Running dnsupdate shows it fails on the same records as above and > dnsupdate --all-names fails on _ALL_ records. > > Is this correct behaviour? (I can't see that being the case) > If not can someone suggest a way forward?
This is a known issue, that produces this cosmetic error. We have a patch to fix it, but want to add tests to ensure it does not regress again in the future. Thanks, Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/ Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba