From: vagy <[email protected]> Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 09:08:57 +0200 >>> Btw how did you examine it? Did you setup a test lab >>> that implements the setup as i described it? >> >> - Setup 2 subnets connected via a router >> - Setup 2 Samba box in each subnet, each smb.conf is like >> >> ----- >> [global] >> workgroup = SAMBAxx >> domain master = yes >> wins support = yes >> remote browse sync = x.x.x.x >> ------ >> >> - x.x.x.x means the IP address of another peer. >> - SAMBAxx means the unique workgroup name (for example SAMBA01 and SAMBA02) >> >> Then, each Samba box exchanges its browse list. >> >> --- >> TAKAHASHI Motonobu <[email protected]> / @damemonyo >> facebook.com/takahashi.motonobu > > Hi Takahashi, > > thats very interesting and is a fallback scenario in case > samba4WINS doesn't work. Maybe the need for a DMB comes > from the fact that you used two different workgroups? > What if workgroup=SAME in both smb.conf?
I used two different workgroups. One is SAMBA01, the other is SAMBA02. If I use same workgroup name, then they should be recognized as a domain. --- TAKAHASHI Motonobu <[email protected]> / @damemonyo facebook.com/takahashi.motonobu -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
