On 2013-05-14 at 13:51 -0300 Fernando Lozano sent off: > >this is just a heads-up that SerNet does provide Samba 4 packages > >(including AD DC package) now. > It was told on the fedora user's list that the kerberos > implementation used by Fedora, RHEL and CentOS conflicts with the > samba one, and so Fedora was providing samba4 binaries without AD DC > support. This was related to the use of FreeIPA by Fedora and RHEL. > > So I wasn't expecting to see packages with AD DC support for RHEL > and CentOS so soon. Thanks a lot! > > But how did you manage the kerberos problem? I see you repo provides > only samba4 packages, and do not replace any other library or daemin > from CentOS and RHEL.
our samba packages use the heimdal that is shipped with s4, we don't use the system krb libs. > Or would the problem be present only on newer Fedora releases, and > not on RHEL6 (yet)? Would this be related to the fact servnet does > not provide samba4 packages for Fedora, or you simply don't package > anything for Fedora? theoretically red hat could also ship a s4 ad dc with built in heimdal kdc but afaik they are working on MIT integration. > Another question: if my CentOS server is using samba3 from sernet > repos, may I upgrade them using sernet samba4? Or should I uninstall > samba3 and do a clean install of samba4, redoing all configuration > manually? yes, the packages are upgradable from previous sernet packages and also from the distribution vendor packages. Björn
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
