Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 03:07:53AM -0700, Gary Maurizi napsal(a): > Thank You Thank You Thank You!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I see eactly the same enthusiasm and celebration as I did yesterday :o)) > '--disable-isc-spnego' > > CentOS base AND epel bind9.8 packages both compile with this, this IS/WAS > the cause of my and every other samba4 CentOS 6 users issue with dynamic > DNS updates. > > 01. Downloading the source RPM, removing this line from the build > --disable-isc-spnego > > 02. and changing --with-gssapi=yes TO: '--with-gssapi=/usr/include/gssapi This is not needed. --with-gssapi=yes the configure autodetect the gssapi so it's ok. > 03. and adding the line --with-dlopen=yes I think this isn't needed also as there are several --with-dlz-XYZ For sure I just removed --disable-isc-spnego (and backported the patch for samba internal dns - removing empty node: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9559 ) and it starts working. I hope I'll find some time and create bug report to the redhat bugzilla. Maybe someone will take a care in RH. > Thank You for updating the WIKI, maybe even a note that the CentOS 6 > version of bind available via YUM will not work, or a note to check with > named -V that --disable-isc-spnego is not in your build, and that > --with-gssapi=yes is wrong and needs to read > --with-gssapi=/usr/include/gssapi or something of that sort, as when I was > working through this, the build-bind page contained only "GSSAPI and dlopen > support" mentions. I'll try once I obtain access to the samba wiki. Best regards, Luf > On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 12:57 AM, Andrew Bartlett <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Mon, 2013-06-03 at 08:02 +0200, steve wrote: > > > On Mon, 2013-06-03 at 09:36 +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2013-06-03 at 01:11 +0200, steve wrote: > > > > > On Mon, 2013-06-03 at 08:16 +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > End users need something simple to install. We also need something > > that > > > > > does dynamic dns reliably. The strong points of the internal dns are > > > > > it's simplicity of installation. Would it be possible to get it to do > > > > > dns updates from nsupdate? > > > > > > > > It does do dns updates from nsupdate. There is a client-side error > > > > shown *after* the successful update, but the developer who developed > > the > > > > patch for this hasn't been able to write the tests to allow his changes > > > > to make it into master. > > > > > > Hi > > > No, I'm sorry but it doesn't. The record goes in once and that's that. > > > You then can't change it. Not with nsupdate. Not with samba-too dns. The > > > only way to free it is to samba_upgradedns to BIND9_DLZ it. > > > > Please re-test with current master and if it still an issue please file > > a bug. > > > > Andrew Bartlett > > > > -- > > Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/ > > Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org > > > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > > instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
