On 30/08/13 23:14, Luca Olivetti wrote:
Al 30/08/13 23:44, En/na steve ha escrit:

Interesting point; you've now sampled winbind, nslcd and sssd to the
same end. Have you made a decision as to which you'll be going with?
Well, the real deployment will take some time (measured in months rather
than weeks), I have a lot more to learn and I'm busy with other things.
I'm not still 100% convinced that I need to migrate from samba 3 to
samba 4, and once I am I have to explain it to my boss.
Anyway I think I'll go with sssd, my unscientific tests (time getent,
time id) tell me it's an order of magnitude faster than nslcd (both for
uncached and cached data).
winbind....I don't like it, for no particular reason. It also seems to
be the slowest of the pack.
Hi, perhaps I can tell you something that will help you make your mind up.

Sometime in September, Samba 4.1 will be released, when it is, 4.0 will move to maintenance mode, 3.6 will only get security fixes and 3.5 will be discontinued. So, do you really want to be basing a new installation on a version that is either discontinued or only getting security fixes?

Rowland
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba

Reply via email to