On Tue, 2013-10-01 at 17:06 +1100, m...@electronico.nc wrote: > Le 01/10/2013 16:44, steve a écrit : > > Hi > > It looks as though the ad backend is broken in 1.11.1. At least I can't > > get it going with a similar sssd.conf: > > https://lists.fedorahosted.org/pipermail/sssd-devel/2013-September/016892.html > > > > I rolled back to 1.10.0 and it's fine. > > > > Re: your question. > > If you can get away without having Linux clients in the domain, then > > yes, you can forget sssd entirely. > > > > HTH and good luck, > > Steve > Ah !!! > This makes sense to my life ( > https://lists.fedorahosted.org/pipermail/sssd-devel/2013-September/016892.html > > ) ! > I was wondering if I won't go back to sheeps and cows ;-) > Will try sssd 1.10.0 ! > (Yes Ubuntu host is actually the only Linux 'client' in the domain) > Thanks again (posting 48 hours earlier would have save my soul during > this time) > Nicolas
Hi The bug in 1.11.1 has been fixed by the Red Hat guys: [PATCH] AD: properly intitialize GC from ad_server option --- src/providers/ad/ad_common.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/providers/ad/ad_common.c b/src/providers/ad/ad_common.c index 700ac03..ab62d64 100644 --- a/src/providers/ad/ad_common.c +++ b/src/providers/ad/ad_common.c @@ -441,7 +441,7 @@ _ad_servers_init(TALLOC_CTX *mem_ctx, } sdata->gc = true; - ret = be_fo_add_server(bectx, fo_service, list[i], 0, sdata, primary); + ret = be_fo_add_server(bectx, fo_gc_service, list[i], 0, sdata, primary); if (ret && ret != EEXIST) { DEBUG(SSSDBG_FATAL_FAILURE, ("Failed to add server\n")); goto done; -- 1.7.7.6 HTH Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba