-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Steve Langasek wrote: >> Let me guess. If I do it this way samba acts as a pdc but the >> clients do not try to update their accounts? Are there any >> drawbacks using this technique? > That makes them act as BDCs instead of all trying to be a PDC. > Trying to deploy multiple PDCs in an NT4 domain and syncing > between them will introduce nasty race conditions that should > be avoided. But we don't have multiple PDCs in _one_ domain. We have five PDCs in _five_ domains plus one master server which acts as "administrative" Server where all Useraccounts are entered but which has no samba running. Does it still work then, if I let the now PDCs be BDCs?
Cheers Nicki - -- Linksystem Muenchen GmbH [EMAIL PROTECTED] Schloerstrasse 10 http://www.link-m.de 80634 Muenchen Tel. 089 / 890 518-0 We make the Net work. Fax 089 / 890 518-77 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.3 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com> Comment: Get my key at: https://www.link-m.de/pgp/n.messerschmidt.asc iQA/AwUBPjFhFes1nPm17iBDEQIo9wCgmPbxl1+CP1wxMtPe/Zn64HYbC/4AoPhC zyW+WicWUngs9HZQXpa2Vemy =LG/m -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
