The W2K client systems may be at different service pack levels: most are probably at 2 or 3. Samba 2.2.7 is running on HP-UX 11.
The last entries in the log.smbd before this happens are: [2003/02/03 10:59:40, 0] printing/nt_printing.c:(281) nt_printing_init: Failed to open nt forms database /usr/local/samba/locks/ntforms.tdb (No locks available) [2003/02/03 10:59:40, 0] printing/nt_printing.c:(281) nt_printing_init: Failed to open nt forms database /usr/local/samba/locks/ntforms.tdb (No locks available) [2003/02/03 10:59:54, 0] printing/nt_printing.c:(281) nt_printing_init: Failed to open nt forms database /usr/local/samba/locks/ntforms.tdb (No locks available) [2003/02/03 10:59:54, 0] printing/nt_printing.c:(281) nt_printing_init: Failed to open nt forms database /usr/local/samba/locks/ntforms.tdb (No locks available) [2003/02/03 11:00:19, 0] printing/nt_printing.c:(281) nt_printing_init: Failed to open nt forms database /usr/local/samba/locks/ntforms.tdb (No locks available) [2003/02/03 11:00:19, 0] printing/nt_printing.c:(281) nt_printing_init: Failed to open nt forms database /usr/local/samba/locks/ntforms.tdb (No locks available) [2003/02/03 11:00:32, 0] printing/nt_printing.c:(281) nt_printing_init: Failed to open nt forms database /usr/local/samba/locks/ntforms.tdb (No locks available) [2003/02/03 11:00:32, 0] printing/nt_printing.c:(281) nt_printing_init: Failed to open nt forms database /usr/local/samba/locks/ntforms.tdb (No locks available) [2003/02/03 11:02:55, 0] printing/nt_printing.c:(281) nt_printing_init: Failed to open nt forms database /usr/local/samba/locks/ntforms.tdb (No locks available) [2003/02/03 11:02:55, 0] printing/nt_printing.c:(281) nt_printing_init: Failed to open nt forms database /usr/local/samba/locks/ntforms.tdb (No locks available) There is nothing strictly reproducible as it seems like a random thing! -----Original Message----- From: Green, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 02 February 2003 15:46 To: 'Grierson, Garry (UK07)'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Drive already connected Error in Windows 2000 (please reply to list) Some standard questions... What service pack level for W2K? What operating system are you running under samba 2.2.7? Do you have a reproducible test case you can post? Anything out of the ordinary in your smb.conf file? Sounds like an operating system resource-limit issue... PG > -----Original Message----- > From: Grierson, Garry (UK07) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 7:45 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: FW: Drive already connected Error in Windows 2000 > > > The log.smbd file has lots of (No locks available) errors.. > > Any help? > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Grierson, Garry (UK07) > > Sent: 28 January 2003 11:36 > > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > > Subject: Drive already connected Error in Windows 2000 > > > > I have been successfully running with Samba 2.0.7 for more > than a year now > > but am having problems using version 2.2.7 > > > > Drive connections to windows 2000 systems have started > coming up with > > 'Drive already connected' errors. > > When I look at the SMBD processes running on the samba > server there are > > several deamons running that are not currently used. There > is also more > > than one connection per client machine and I cant seem to > kill -15 (or > > even kill -9) these smbd deamons. > > > > Any help would be gratefully appreciated! > -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
