Hi Brad, As it seems that nobody answered your quiry yet, here you have some feedback...
We have used Samba with both windows-NT and Terminal servers(Citrix) for over a year now. It works just fine :-) Concerning the Terminal servers and Samba we have only been bothered with the following 2 problems: - we had to increase the constant MAX_CONNECTIONS in smbd/conn.c since the total number of drives being mapped from the Terminal server was higher than 128(default). We chose 1024 instead which gave us a reasonable margin. - originally we used %U and %G to point to the users login path and for our PDF generator. However, we had to give up using these "variables", since the user and group IDs were cached somewhere, resulting in user and group mixups on the Samba server. Even though it is a late answer(I subscribe to the digest version of the mailinglist), I hope you can use it. Regards, Hans. > Message: 38 > Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 14:59:02 -0400 > From: "Portelance, Brad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [Samba] Samba & Terminal Services / Citrix > To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain > > Hello! > > I have heard that there is a problem with using Samba along > with Windows > Terminal Services and that it's related to session IDs with > multiple users > coming from one server. > > I'm in the process of moving to Windows Server 2003 using > Citrix and hoping > to be able to revive our samba use. > > Has anyone had any success with using samba in a Terminal > Server / Citrix > environment? > > Thanks in advance for any information! > > Brad
-- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
