i understand. please read my original question....
----- Original Message ----- From: "Marian Mlcoch, Ing" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "ipguy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 6:56 PM Subject: Re: [Samba] subshares ? > No you not understand priority of permisions on NT and samba is this > identical but samba without ACL is simples. > > Highest priority to acces any file is file permision and owner on linux > filesystem respect by samba. > Secondary is directory permision and ownership with parent respect > structure. > And last is share definition that set only permision implicit for network. > > if share is read only then all under this share is read only used over this > share but another share can be write to this or its subdirs. > else if share is writable then only user with suficient name and group to > !!share directory!! permision can write to directory structure as is rename > delete or create files and subdirs. And only users and groups that have suff > permision to exist files can read, execute or change it. This all is > controlled by filesystem not over samba conf (if you install filesystem with > acl then you can set more perms on one file as clasic user-group-other). > > Samba conf only control settings perm of new files and dirs created over > net. > > Bye. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "ipguy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "John H Terpstra" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 10:33 AM > Subject: Re: [Samba] subshares ? > > > > so my only option is NT ACL support then... > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 3 Jun 2003, ipguy wrote: > > > > > > > hi all... > > > > i have what seems a simple question regarding subshares, for lack of a > > better term... > > > > say i have a share with specific user/group permissions and a > directory > > inside the share that i would like to add different user/group > > permissions... > > > > this is an example of my smb.conf file to illustrate > > > > > > > > [driveA] > > > > path = /samba/driveA > > > > browseable = Yes > > > > writeable = Yes > > > > valid users = PDC+groupA > > > > force group = PDC+groupA > > > > > > > > [driveB] > > > > path = /samba/driveA/driveB > > > > browseable = No > > > > writeable = Yes > > > > valid users = PDC+groupB > > > > force group = PDC+groupB > > > > inherit permissions = No > > > > > > > > shouldn't this restrict groupA users from accessing the subshare > called > > > > "driveB" located inside the share "/samba/driveA" ?? > > > > > > driveB is a directory in /samba/driveA from the perspective of the > driveA > > > share. IT is NOT a sub-share, there is no such thing in the SMB/CIFS > > > protocol specification. > > > > > > That means that users of the share called driveA will be able to access > > > the contents of the directory driveB as permitted by the permissions on > > > the driveBdirectory. > > > > > > - John T. > > > -- > > > John H Terpstra > > > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba > -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
