On Thu, 12 Jun 2003, Ow Mun Heng wrote: > Can you explain why it's Bad? Due to Excessive Overhead I presume..
Yep. MS Windows clients do NOT support it. SSL support in Samba always was experimental and was not maintained so the code fell into bit rot really quickly. - John T. > > Cheers, > Mun Heng, Ow > H/M Engineering > Western Digital M'sia > DID : 03-7870 5168 > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Andrew Bartlett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 4:49 PM > To: Ow Mun Heng > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba with SSL Support - how to know? > > > On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 04:39:07PM +0800, Ow Mun Heng wrote: > > Hi Guys, > > > > How can I know if my version of samba was compiled with SSL support? > > I'm using Redhat 8's rpm version 2.2.7a security fixed. > > Unlikaly, as there is no good reason to enable SSL support. Furthermore, > RedHat got 'told' back in 7.0 days about how bad an idea this is... > > Samba 3.0 has had this code removed. > > Andrew Bartlett > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba > -- John H Terpstra Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
