On Thu, 2003-06-26 at 10:23, William Jojo wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 25 Jun 2003, William Jojo wrote: > > > > > anyway the bug i'm tracking is a failure to expand the macros SAFE_FREE > > and VA_COPY. is compiles fine in AIX 5.1. as soon as i figure that one > > out, i'll forward it. > > > > > found it. you are penalized in snprintf.c if you have all three of > HAVE_SNPRINTF, HAVE_VSNPRINTF and HAVE_C99_VSNPRINTF by what i believe is > an unnecessary else clause. It will include stdio.h, but will not define > SAFE_FREE and VA_COPY. > > AIX 5.1 does not have vsnprintf so it compiles there. > > I think this is what the change should be - pardon my misuse if diff, i > would like to know the correct format for submitting patches, but could > not find it during my short search of the site.
diff -u would make this legible. Also, what version was this against? Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Student Network Administrator, Hawker College [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
