>Yup. Also spotted him on the list anyway. Got some >leads from him but most of them are for 3.0 (which >I'll need later).
Don't be confused by "3.0" in the name of the document. 99% perhaps even 100% of the printing related information is not version dependent. Version 3.0 is better for printing because the resolution of bug #82 was checked into 3.0 branch and not in 2.2.8 branch because they probably don't want to maintain that branch so actively now that 3.0 is out. The team is spread a little too thin. >Also check this out: > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] printers]# pwd >/var/lib/samba/printers >[EMAIL PROTECTED] printers]# ls -l >total 3 >drwxrwxr-x 2 root adm 48 Mar 16 06:50 W32ALPHA/ >drwxrwxr-x 2 root adm 48 Mar 16 06:50 W32MIPS/ >drwxrwxr-x 2 root adm 48 Mar 16 06:50 W32PPC/ >drwxrwxr-x 2 root adm 48 Mar 16 06:50 W32X86/ >drwxrwxr-x 2 root adm 48 Mar 16 06:50 WIN40/ >[EMAIL PROTECTED] printers]# > >According to reasearch, this is where I think the >printer drivers are supposed to wind up and >apparently they are not even after adding >Administrator to the adm group. W32X86 is the most >likely target since that is where they are on the XP >client. I'm going to run some more tests on this >(after I get some Z's) to be sure. This is a directory which is created by a template in samba.spec, not necessarily the directory in which samba will look for it, which is ruled by an option to configure command IIRC and is usually "drivers" directory. I resolved the ambiguity have one name linked to the other. ____________________________________________________________ Get advanced SPAM filtering on Webmail or POP Mail ... Get Lycos Mail! http://login.mail.lycos.com/r/referral?aid=27005 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
