> > > Fine. Use reiserfs and don't worry about ctime. > > > > Why? Does reiserfs handle ctime in a different way than other linux > > filesystems? > > It's not supposed to given the same instructions from clients but it > appears to because perhaps it elicits different kind of response from > Office. Maybe Office behaves different when the samba server's fs is > reiser.
Quite interesting. Can you describe any particular case of a different behavior (samba + ext2 vs. samba + reiser)? I really wonder where the roots of such differences are. > In any case, reiserfs is superior to or at least as good as any other > Linux fs. I do not discuss quality of the filesystems. I thought that there were no differences in the way of using access times between all linux native filesystems (ext2/3, reiser, xfs, jfs). -- Honza Houstek -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
