I have problems with browsing, AFAI see ... There are 2 Samba 3.0-hosts in the subnet 192.168.16. called server and backup. The workgroup is buero.
server has 2 NICs with the ips 192.168.16.200 and 192.168.16.201. backup has one NIC with ip 192.168.16.112. server is configured with the options: local master=yes preferred master=yes os type=40 backup with: os type=20 local master=yes (to provide backup-browser-service). interfaces parameter is not set. I want Samba to use both NICs on server. testparm runs ok on each host. Look at these lines: > server:~ # nmblookup -M buero > querying buero on 192.168.16.255 > 192.168.16.201 buero<1d> > 192.168.16.201 buero<1d> > server:~ # So I get two answers over the localhost-interface, I assume. Why is it two times the .201-ip? If I try the same from backup: > backup:~ # nmblookup -M buero > added interface ip=192.168.16.112 bcast=192.168.16.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 > querying buero on 192.168.16.255 > Got a positive name query response from 192.168.16.201 ( 192.168.16.201 ) > Got a positive name query response from 192.168.16.201 ( 192.168.16.201 ) > Got a positive name query response from 192.168.16.201 ( 192.168.16.201 ) > Got a positive name query response from 192.168.16.201 ( 192.168.16.201 ) > 192.168.16.201 buero<1d> > 192.168.16.201 buero<1d> > 192.168.16.201 buero<1d> > 192.168.16.201 buero<1d> I get four responses .... Question: Should the backup:/etc/hosts contain both ips of server like: 192.168.16.200 server 192.168.16.201 server How should this be handled? I know this is another topic but has possibly the same reason: > backup:~ # tail /var/log/messages > Oct 27 15:20:06 backup sshd[21744]: Could not reverse map address 192.168.16.201. > Oct 27 15:20:06 backup sshd[21744]: Accepted rsa for root from ::ffff:192.168.16.201 > port 46587 Reverse DNS ... I will look that up, I promise ... I think that ... this ... > server:~ # tail /var/log/messages > Oct 27 15:22:19 server nmbd[1318]: find_response_record: response packet id 19864 > received with no matching record. > Oct 27 15:22:20 server nmbd[1318]: [2003/10/27 15:22:20, 0] > nmbd/nmbd_responserecordsdb.c:find_response_record(235) > Oct 27 15:22:20 server nmbd[1318]: find_response_record: response packet id 19863 > received with no matching record. > Oct 27 15:22:20 server nmbd[1318]: [2003/10/27 15:22:20, 0] > nmbd/nmbd_responserecordsdb.c:find_response_record(235) ... and this ... > backup:~ # tail /var/log/samba/log.nmbd > query_name_response: Multiple (3) responses received for a query on subnet > 192.168.16.112 for name BUERO<1d>. > This response was from IP 192.168.16.201, reporting an IP address of 192.168.16.201. > query_name_response: Multiple (4) responses received for a query on subnet > 192.168.16.112 for name BUERO<1d>. > This response was from IP 192.168.16.201, reporting an IP address of 192.168.16.201. > query_name_response: Multiple (2) responses received for a query on subnet > 192.168.16.112 for name BUERO<1d>. > This response was from IP 192.168.16.201, reporting an IP address of 192.168.16.201. > query_name_response: Multiple (3) responses received for a query on subnet > 192.168.16.112 for name BUERO<1d>. > This response was from IP 192.168.16.201, reporting an IP address of 192.168.16.201. > query_name_response: Multiple (4) responses received for a query on subnet > 192.168.16.112 for name BUERO<1d>. > This response was from IP 192.168.16.201, reporting an IP address of 192.168.16.201. > backup:~ # ... results from the same wrong configuration . Am I right? What should I do about it? Thank you, Stefan G. Weichinger mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
