>Andrew Bartlett wrote: > > On each of our Citrix servers we can have up to 100 users all > > connecting to 10 shares on the samba server = 1000 connections > > 'services' for that one citrix server? > I know all this. Now all I need is for you to write it up in > bugzilla.samba.org so we can remmember to get it fixed.
Yes, well. I got carried away. And when people now search the mailinglist they might get a thread-hit on Citrix issues here. ;-) I have posted a 'bug' report: #716. Tried to follow the guidelines for filling it in. Hopefully it is acceptable. > > In most other environments other than Citrix this would not be a > > problem (ie w2k workstation clients). > You would be surprised. Even with non-citrix setups, we get > multiple %U mappings, and all the resultant fun. Even single client environments which probably 95% of the usage versus Samba is in the rest of the world? It definitely is a problem for Metaframe users. > > changelog for 2.2.8 we could not find any related fixes to Citrix > > problems. > The main issue is the security fixes. But can you write down > what you have learnt? You mean as a chapter on Citrix Metaframe for us Samba users? Some of the issues I listed are from the mailinglist (which do not directly consern our current setup) and others we just did to solve a problem and not to solve the cause of the problem. But I might attempt to write something about the problems that we have worked through yes. Per Kjetil Grotnes -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
