On Fri, 28 Nov 2003, tcg wrote: > On Wednesday 26 November 2003 08:41, Thiago Lima wrote: > > In a past thread I've notice that smbmount (and mount's suport for > > What's quoted is all I see of your post for some strange reason (both in kmail > and evolution). I see no body at all when using sylpheed. Very strange. > But that's not why I'm replying<g>. > I did post a comment to the effect of "smbmount is deprecated", but that was > just my understanding from what happens in the distro I'm using; when I type > "smbmount" it suggests "mount -t smbfs" instead, so my assumption was that > they were deprecating the use of "smbmount" with the replacement syntax of > "mount -t smbfs". Apologies if I misled anyone. >
mount is a front-end to smbmount when correctly called with the '-t smbfs' parameters. First: Please note that smbfs is a Linux kernel driver - it is not part of Samba. Samba ships the smbmount/smbmnt, smbumnt/smbumount front-end parsers only. The Samba-Team do no development, and provide no maintenance support for smbfs. If you are having smbfs problems please refer these to the Linux kernel team. The Linux-2.6 kernel has the new replacement for smbfs called cifsfs. - John T. -- John H Terpstra Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
