-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Chris Lalancette wrote: | Hello all, | I am having a problem with Samba 3.0.0 (I have actually tested | this with 3.0.1pre3, and seem to have the same problem). I am trying to | add a new message to smbcontrol. I have put the code into smbcontrol.c, | and I can deliver messages to the samba processes (using the command | line: ./smbcontrol smbd <mymsg>). The problem is that | messages get delivered to the Samba processes differently depending on | whether I am connecting to them by IP address, or by NetBIOS name. If I | use the NetBIOS name, the message gets delivered to all processes; if I | use the IP address, the message really only gets delivered to the main | smbd process (the reason that this is important is that I would like to | not use nmbd, if possible). I have tracked this down in the code, and it | seems that the difference is in the way new connections get added to the | connection.tdb database. My question is whether this is intentional, a | bug in the client, or a bug in Samba? (Also, is this the right mailing | list for this, or should I get on technical?)
If you are in the code (bug fixes, patches, etc...) you should be on sambna-technical. If it is a qucik things, then you can try to catch someone on irc.freenode.netc (#samba-technical).
cheers, jerry ~ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ~ Hewlett-Packard ------------------------- http://www.hp.com ~ SAMBA Team ---------------------- http://www.samba.org ~ GnuPG Key ---- http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc ~ "If we're adding to the noise, turn off this song" --Switchfoot (2003) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQE/z2D/IR7qMdg1EfYRAli3AJ9GzTNkWLINVZKiBrHnhuIEfghAHwCg6mbe lviSNMFfacoNtaI1bEaRGcg= =NBpz -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
