In the Spam that made it onto this list yesterday I took the time to look
into the headers (out of curiosity) and I found this:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on
dp.samba.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-84.0 required=3.5 tests=BANG_GUARANTEE,BAYES_99,
BEST_PORN,CLICK_BELOW_CAPS,DATE_IN_FUTURE_06_12,HTML_50_60,
HTML_LINK_CLICK_CAPS,HTML_LINK_CLICK_HERE,HTML_MESSAGE,LESBIAN,
LIVE_PORN,USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=no version=2.61
So SpamAssassin (which I am a big fan of, BTW) scanned the message and
somehow determine that the hits for it should be -84 in spite of all the
various marks against it? What's up with that?
Uh... could it be that the Samba lists server isn't set up properly for
SpamAssassin? Anyway, perhaps someone should point that out to whomever is
maintaining the lists on samba.org ;-)
(Sorry for OT, I just found that very odd indeed ;-)
--
Sam Hart
University/Work addr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Personal addr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Alternative <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
end
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
