I'm testing SAMBA 3.0.2 on a Solaris 9 box with a UFS file system.

The ACLs appear to be working well with the security tab, etc. However, once a permission setting has been made from a security tab on a directory, the mask and default mask parameters no longer appear in a getfacl. In addition, the #effective permission is incorrect. Has anyone seen this? I searched the archives and I can't seem to find an mention of it.

The smb.conf is quite simple, its a test machine. I can reply with it if necessary.

Here's an example:

I've made the directory and shared it:
# getfacl /samba/export/testshare2

# file: /samba/export/testshare2
# owner: dpullman
# group: melsaunx
user::rwx
group::r-x              #effective:r-x
mask:r-x
other:r-x
default:user::rwx
default:group::r-x
default:mask:r-x
default:other:r-x

Now I've gone to the share and changed the group and default group perms from an XP security tab:
# getfacl /samba/export/testshare2


# file: /samba/export/testshare2
# owner: dpullman
# group: melsaunx
user::rwx
group::rwx              #effective:r--
other:r-x
default:user::rwx
default:group::rwx
default:other:r-x

Note that mask and default:mask are gone. The perms for group and the default group work as listed, but not as the #effective entry shows, which is how it normally does.

This is a case of everything is working, but it looks funny under the covers :) Makes one a bit nervous.

--
David Pullman
NIST - Gaithersburg

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Reply via email to