> > | All below are good new features. Only thing missing > > | IMHO is performance improvements. > > | If I missed, or if it is planned for future releases > > | please accept my apologies. > > We continually work on improving performance as we > > can. What specifically are you referring to? > I referred to Davon Shire's e-mail dated 09 March 2004 18:59. > In the mean time, I remember some programs indicate performance gain by > percentage. I do not remember any name in my mind. But, IMHO similiar > approach maybe good for samba.
Try using "smbtorture". We get very good performance from not terribly powerful hardware. ftp://ftp.kalamazoolinux.org/pub/pdf/PerfTune2001.pdf $ ./smbtorture //sardine/torture -Uadam%****** 32 NBW95 host=sardine share=torture user=adam myname=estate2 Running NBW95 1 clients started +* Throughput 473.344 MB/sec (NB=591.68 MB/sec 4733.44 MBit/sec) NBW95 took 0.278914 secs $ ./smbtorture //sardine/torture -Uadam%****** 32 NBWNT host=sardine share=torture user=adam myname=estate2 Running NBWNT 1 clients started +* Throughput 456.839 MB/sec (NB=571.049 MB/sec 4568.39 MBit/sec) NBWNT took 0.289049 secs -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba