I have switched back to samba 2.2.8a (compiled from source) on linux 2.6.5: same behaviour.
Marco Berizzi wrote: > Me again. I have upgraded to linux kernel > 2.6.5. However this problem hasn't gone away. > The md5 check is fine, coping the same file > from NT4TSE to a Windoze 2000sp4. > Coping the same file from a windoze 2000sp4 > to the samba share is ok. So the problem is > between NT4TSE and samba. > > NT4TSE --> SAMBA = KO > WIN2k --> SAMBA = OK > NT4TSE --> WIN2K = OK > > Can anybody help me? > Marco Berizzi wrote: > > Hello everybody. > > > > I'm experimenting this problem with > > samba 3.0.2a and linux 2.4.25 with > > ReiserFS. > > When I copy (put) a large file (5GB) > > from a Windows NT terminal server sp6a > > to the samba-linux box, the md5sum is > > different between the two file. Files > > size are identical. > > I'm using this command to copy these > > files from windows to samba: > > > > xcopy f:\ \\mimas\backup\exchange /e /c /h /r > > > > I have also tried to delete the old > > files from the samba share, but nothing > > change: I always get two different md5sum. > > With smaller files (400MB) md5sum is > > identical. > > When I transfer this large file with ftp > > (proftpd 1.2.9 on Linux), md5sum is ok. > > > > These two systems are connected to a 3COM > > 100bit/s switch. No collision/no error are > > detected at linux side box. Samba doesn't > > log anything relevant. No kernel error. > > Nothing. Samba box is running Slackware 9.1 > > + kernel 2.4.25 + samba 3.0.2a compiled > > from sources. > > > > Hints? > > > > PS: Please CC me I'm not subscribed to this list. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
