On Sat, 2004-05-15 at 03:34, Nathan R. Valentine wrote: > > I will test the results from both Windows and Mac OS X clients with the > > data hosted on a Windows server to measure the results. From experience, > > I expect that the Mac OS X clients will still perform worse but not to > > the same degree as when the data was hosted on Samba. > > Turns out that we are seeing similar CPU spikes on the server whether > the server is a Windows box of a *nix box running Samba. To me, this > would indicate that this is a problem with the Mac OS X client. Based on > the packet dumps, I would say that the Mac OS X Samba system is doing > the the directory contents lookups in a very inefficient manner. Since > OS X is running a version of Samba... Anyone have any tips?
Actually, the OSX client is the smbfs originally from FreeBSD. (And unrelated to the Linux smbfs). Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Student Network Administrator, Hawker College [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
