On Sat, 2004-05-01 at 03:23, Jay D. Anderson wrote: > I wrote about this problem more than a week ago, but got no response. I > upgraded to 3.0.3 hoping this issue would go away, but it hasn't. > > I am seeing the problem running Samba 3.0.2a or 3.0.3 on both Solaris 8 > and RH Linux ES3. This problem was not present in Samba 2.2.8a. > > The Samba servers are member servers of an Active Directory domain, and > all other file and print sharing is working well. Global section of > smb.conf included below. I am not running winbindd. > > On a Windows XP client that hasn't been added to Active Directory yet, > domain credentials will not authenticate to the Samba server if the > credentials are given in the form [EMAIL PROTECTED] The same > operation against a Windows server works fine. If the credentials are > supplied in other forms to the Samba server, they will work (e.g., > mydomain\username, mydomain.com\username). If the Windows XP client is > added to the AD domain, the credentials will work in any of the formats. > > From an auth:10 debug, it appears Samba is using the entire > [EMAIL PROTECTED] string as the username rather than breaking it > into username and domain components. I have a "log level = 3 auth:10" > log file available on request.
Samba simply does not know how to handle this username format. If you forward me that log, I can look at it, but is there any urgent reason why you cannot use the more traditional username formats? Also, please file a bug on bugzilla.samba.org (I intend to fix it, it's just a matter of what urgency this is, if there is a good workaround). Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Student Network Administrator, Hawker College [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
