On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 01:06:00PM -0400, Shannon Johnson wrote: > OK, I got the snapshot version from last night and installed it, and > finally got it to start. It complained briefly about the unix extensions > option being set in the share section when it should be in the global > section, but after I moved it, I get no complaints. > > A few questions about it -- > > 1) When I test it, I mount the share from a linux client, then try to > create a link (both hard and symbolic) from an existing file to a new > file within the share. Is this an adequate test of the "unix extensions" > functionality? > > 2) Assuming that's a good test, it means something isn't working... I'm > still getting an "Operating not permitted" error, on both the hard link > and the symbolic link. I'll be glad to be the test subject, if this part > of the project needs extra testing...
Ok, I'm running current SAMBA_3_0 svn (snapshot) version with Steve French's cifsvfs-1.0.7a client on a Fedora Core 2 preview 2 system (Kernel 2.6.3) system and symlinks and hardlinks both work fine here. What client are you running ? Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
