On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 04:18:39PM -0500, Chris Garrigues wrote: > > From: Jeremy Allison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 13:54:23 -0700 > > > > > P.S. I've turned oplocks off on the customer's server. Am I correct in > > > thinking that will mask the problem so they won't see it? > > > > Yes, it will. Are you sure you're running the SVN code. I did fix a bug > > recently (friday I think) that would cause a client to get a double return > > from a rename which might have caused that. Unless it's that, it doesn't > > look like a deferred open problem. > > My customer is running a week-old SVN, I'm running one from this morning. > Sounds like I should put this morning's SVN on their machine and leave oplocks > off.
Yes, todays svn is significantly better than 1 week old. I'll be doing lots of Q/A on it this week in preparation for 3.0.5pre2. Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
