On Thu, 2004-12-23 at 21:59, Torbjorn Tornkvist wrote: > Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> >It is. See the Samba4 code for a bit more detail, there are a few > >things that are not quite as you might expect, mostly regarding the 'NT > >response' that should form part of the calculation. > > > > > > > Ok, thanx a lot ! > > Do you know if the NTLMSSP stuff is specified anywhere ? > I 've noticed that there is an RFC for SPNEGO. Not formally. There is a bit of documentation about: http://davenport.sf.net/ntlm.html See in particular the referneces in this document. Also, there is my final year research thesis: http://hawkerc.net/staff/abartlet/thesis-gpl.pdf the source of whcih is in http://download.samba.org/ftp/unpacked/lorikeet/trunk/samba4-ad-thesis/ and should 'soon' be part of the main docs tree. Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org Student Network Administrator, Hawker College [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
