the
konqueror bug is fixed , after a yast update as far i know for 9.2
David Phillips schrieb:
On the other hand, I just dumped using suse 9.2 on my desktop and laptop
because they have yet to fix the i/o error trying to browse mounted cifs
shares via konqueror. Fedora 3 works with them like a charm. I guess
they each have their pluses and minuses
Dave P
On Fri, 2005-01-07 at 01:43 +0100, Rolf A. Vaglid wrote:
John Schmerold skrev:
I'm really sick of trying to get Fedora working with Samba & LDAP, I've
read all the books, technotes etc etc
Still no glory after several months of fighting with it.
So: I'm going to give SUSE 9.2 a shot, after 6 years of Red Hat, however
I'll certainly need some support & don't know which list &/or news
groups are "best"
Anyone care to make a recommendation or two?
Hi John, I have the exact opinion. I have tried several times setting up
Samba/LDAP on Redhat and Fedora, only to come to the same conclution
as you. I ended up buying SuSE 9.2, and now it seems to work as a charm.
I just spent a couple of hours setting up a Postfix/Dovecot/Horde -> pam
-> OpenLDAP solution with no problems at all. I'll hook up
authentication from a Samba server to this server tomorrow.
My point is that it seems almost like SuSE had this scenario in mind in
9.2, as opposed to Fedora et al. The reaseon I decided trying suse when
giving up on Fedora was just the fact that John H. T. used Suse in his
book "Samba 3 by Example". ( By the way; thanks John H. T. )
I'll still go for Fedora on my desktops and laptop tho, mainly due to
apt-get and the fact that most software packages are availible as Fedora
rpms.
Do drop me a mail if you get into trouble on Samba/LDAP on SuSE.
Cheers
Rolf
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
