I am having some problems. Apparently one of my machines that is used
as a print monitor (running the queues on a Win98 screen) with the default
'lpq cache time=' value was running at 100% CPU. I'm not sure what's
causing it and haven't had the time to mess with tracing, etc, yet. But
that problem has been reported to me a number of times so far. I forget
what the default is, but before someone warns me (I had proposed using = 5
to solve the print queue problem) about my settings I just wanted to
mention that. ;)
---- _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _
|Y#| | | |\/| | \ |\ | | | Ryan Novosielski - User Support Spec. III
|$&| |__| | | |__/ | \| _| | [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 973/972.0922 (2-0922)
\__/ Univ. of Med. and Dent. | IST/ACS - NJMS Medical Science Bldg - C630
On Fri, 14 Jan 2005, St�phane Purnelle wrote:
What do you mean with performance problem.
I ask this question because I upgraded my samba version 3.0.7 -> 3.0.10 and
all windows 9x clients have problem when use office 97 files.
The network is very slow and CPU is 100%.
Maybe is because my office97 is installed to my server ?
The windows 2000 client not have this problem because office97 is not used
from server.
Sheikji Nazirudeen a �crit :
Hello folks,
Has anyone experienced problems with ver 3.0.10? I just upgraded to
3.0.10 and have been having my memory eaten up. Any help would be
appreciated.
Sheikji Nazirudeen
IT Analyst
Syracuse University
315-443-1207
--
St�phane Purnelle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Site Web : http://www.linuxplusvalue.be
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
