On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 13:40:42 +1100 Andrew Tridgell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Perhaps the most common case is where a user on the client does "del *.*". > In that case the client asks for a directory listing, then it asks to > delete each file one at a time, but it provides the mangled (8.3) name > for the file in the SMBunlink call rather than the full name. Are shortnames still too common to make them optional? It's unfortunate that you incur the overhead of shortname support on all clients when only a small number of scenarios require them. Mike -- Greedo shoots first? Not in my Star Wars. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
