-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| On Mon, 7 Feb 2005, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
|
|>IMO the privileges should be stored in local tdb files.  I'm working on
|>trying to get enough of the SAM replication protocol working to
|>replicate the privilege assignments working.
|
| Out of curiosity, is there a reason why they shouldn't
| be stored in the LDAP directory when using ldapsam?

IMO there is no advantage.  The privileges would be
separate entries that would be stored as a bitmask
or an octet-string.  Nothing that you would be editing
via LDAP tools.

The main advantage of LDAP is to consolidate
information that is shared by 2 or more applications.
Storing users makes sense.  Storing privileges is just
using LDAP like a database.





cheers, jerry
=====================================================================
Alleviating the pain of Windows(tm)      ------- http://www.samba.org
GnuPG Key                ----- http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc
"I never saved anything for the swim back."     Ethan Hawk in Gattaca
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFCB9CZIR7qMdg1EfYRArhhAJ9dNFa2ADjfAXpfrvKYM76yb7tzoQCg4ToI
TUo/qs2IlcuSBm4R/XcqZ0U=
=TrUd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Reply via email to