>I don't understand this statement. Do you mean that the >changes to the username map semantics in Samba 3.0.8 >broke your servers ?
I simply say that its not functionally after 3.0.7 (only work with the user_domain format, in all clients), >I added a line 'jerry = [EMAIL PROTECTED]' and the logon worked >fine. That's a little misleading thought. But it does work. Moreover, you must be "touching" the windows`s registry in specific place, in case the Microsoft products. Daniel. "Gerald (Jerry) Carter" wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Daniel Romeo wrote: > | We did it and we do it translating @ to _ in > | /usr/local/samba/private/username.map > | (user_domain = [EMAIL PROTECTED]) in the PDCserver (Linux > | and BSD) and Fileservers (microsoft and unix�s family), > > Ahh... I see. I had not considered that. In fact it > does work. :-) > > | but the question is other: Until samba-3.0.7 it�s possible. > | Anything have changed. > > I don't understand this statement. Do you mean that the > changes to the username map semantics in Samba 3.0.8 > broke your servers ? > > I added a line 'jerry = [EMAIL PROTECTED]' and the logon worked > fine. That's a little misleading thought. But it does work. > > cheers, jerry > ===================================================================== > Alleviating the pain of Windows(tm) ------- http://www.samba.org > GnuPG Key ----- http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc > "I never saved anything for the swim back." Ethan Hawk in Gattaca > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iD8DBQFCB+E0IR7qMdg1EfYRAmjjAJ9QhY+DqKGMrzuZuGvLr7uyMrSR1wCeKcV0 > jELRNvXcK7/08Ok6iSnN30Q= > =bOTr > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
