-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Carlos Knowlton wrote: | Hi, | | | I've been having a problem in Samba version 3, using "security = | share". When you have a share that you want to be read-only to one | group, and read-write to another. It ends up being read-write for both | groups. This behavior seems inconsistent with Samba 2.2.x behavior. | Have the configuration options changed, or is this a bug? This issue is | listed on Samba's bugzilla site: | https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1844 | and so far, the only reaction I've seen by talking to Samba people about | it, is that "security = share" is major pain, and nobody wants to deal | with it's problems. Is share level security being phased out of Samba, | or am I just missing the right configuration options?
No. I wish we could kill it and security = server for that matter. But I think we're going to have to fix this after all. I really *hate* security = share.
Hopefully we'll be able to get to this for 3.0.12.
cheers, jerry ===================================================================== Alleviating the pain of Windows(tm) ------- http://www.samba.org GnuPG Key ----- http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc "I never saved anything for the swim back." Ethan Hawk in Gattaca -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFCCgKIIR7qMdg1EfYRAshkAKDWUFL8k3w5OoMU7TRd5bV/KwDtpQCgjG0l syJWOLcVYmdZ+L9Dm+Tt8CM= =52Yl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
