Carlos Rodrigues wrote:
I understand that smbfs supports some older SMB dialects that cifs
doesn't, but why the need for two modules? Couldn't they be merged somehow?
Just saying this because the existence of two different ways of mounting
smb shares, (apparently) very similar, is kind of confusing.
Just wanting some info.
That's the way it works in the Open Source World. Evolution at
furious pace and a fiercely hostile environment that ensures only
the fittest survive.
--
Taso Hatzi
tr -d "blewky" <<-QWERTY
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
QWERTY
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
