Andrew Bartlett wrote:



b) We are going to be missing out on fun things like "ldapsam:trusted=yes" by staying with ldapsam_compat

I would suggest looking into speed improvements (such as the continuing
work on this) before breaking your ldap into tiny pieces.  One domain
really should be the way to do this.
I know :-/

Is 20,000+ users in a domain something that samba can do quickly yet? As far as I know we've done all the standard things - indexes in openldap, nscd on the PDC & quick hardware. Openldap is certainly quick enough - the entire people OU comes back in about 5-6 seconds, so I've run out of obvious things to tweak. Is ldapsam *that much* quicker than ldapsam_compat for large numbers of users?
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Reply via email to