From: Nishanth Aravamudan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


Use msleep() instead of schedule_timeout() to guarantee the task
delays as expected. TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE is used in the current code, but signals
are not checked for, so I believe the change to msleep() is appropriate.

Signed-off-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Domen Puncer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
 proc.c |    4 ++--
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Index: quilt/fs/smbfs/proc.c
===================================================================
--- quilt.orig/fs/smbfs/proc.c
+++ quilt/fs/smbfs/proc.c
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
 #include <linux/smb_fs.h>
 #include <linux/smbno.h>
 #include <linux/smb_mount.h>
+#include <linux/delay.h>
 
 #include <net/sock.h>
 
@@ -2397,8 +2398,7 @@ smb_proc_readdir_long(struct file *filp,
                if (req->rq_rcls == ERRSRV && req->rq_err == ERRerror) {
                        /* a damn Win95 bug - sometimes it clags if you 
                           ask it too fast */
-                       current->state = TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE;
-                       schedule_timeout(HZ/5);
+                       msleep(200);
                        continue;
                 }
 

--
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Reply via email to