On Mon, 2005-10-24 at 12:40 -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote: > On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 03:35:41PM -0400, William Jojo wrote: > > > > Has anyone been able to get Heimdal 0.7.1 with Samba 3.0.20b to compile > > successfully without commenting out the __cplusplus stuff in > > include/includes.h? If I comment it out, it's fine on FC3. The Heimdal > > people are using "private" as a structure member name, so I know it's a > > Heimdal problem :-). > > I think you need to remove the __cplusplus change in Samba3 to make > things compile.
Should we make this only for --enable-developer, given we don't control what may be in system headers? > > Also, should one be using Heimdal or MIT krb for use in 3.x? > > I see much talk of Heimdal in Samba 4 and wondering where I should be > > concentraing my education now and in the future. :-) In terms of 'user experience', the administrator shouldn't see either the MIT or Heimdal administration tools, and we are a fair way off from even relying on system libs (so installing the right thing won't be a concern). As such, you won't see very much of either, except if you start looking carefully at the code. > Samba4 has integrated Heimdal as their KDC as the architecture > is vastly easier to integrate than the MIT codebase (having > the Heimdal author help with this also hasn't hurt :-). It does make my life easier :-) Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/ Samba Developer, SuSE Labs, Novell Inc. http://suse.de Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org Student Network Administrator, Hawker College http://hawkerc.net
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
