Hi Eric,
this is no tattoted effect , the policy is simple holded ( kind of
cached ) since it get upgraded
by another one , this behavior can be also controlled by the policy
itself ,as far i remember it is an
parameter for that in the layouts of the group policy editor.
Keep care that you dont have policies whic are concurent for same or
equal features,
this can lead to "magic" effects and think twice before setting a policy
, it can take longer time to get it refreshed
i advice to read about policies in technet and google sites which are around
Best Regards
Eric A. Hall schrieb:
Thanks for the catch, I added a paragraph on that point
On 11/4/2005 4:43 AM, Ilia Chipitsine wrote:
the greatest article in my opinion on that subject. really.
I could never find time to write my one.
probably more attention should be paid to so called "tatoo effect":
1) I write my custom template
2) I find it doesn't do what I want to do (after I propagated registry
changes to users and computers)
...
3) I delete custom.adm from poledit list of template (with hope all
changes we be restored)
4) obviously, changes remain in the registry
After trying to get all the policy stuff nailed down I figured I'd save
others the trouble, so I wrote up a primer and posted it on my site at
http://www.ehsco.com/reading/20051031.html
Hoepfully that will save others some trouble
--
Eric A. Hall http://www.ehsco.com/
Internet Core Protocols http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/coreprot/
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
