samba1.20.cdunham at spamgourmet.com escreveu:
> I'm running Suse 9.2 (kernel 2.6.8-24) with Samba 3.0.20b
>
> When I use security=user, my read/write performance is less than half
> the peformance with security=share. Why? There are no other changes,
> but performance is never better than half the speed. This happens with
> WinXP, Win2K and Win98 clients, so I don't think the client
> configuration is the problem. Network is gigabit, with Intel Pro/1000
> adapters.
Did you setup the socket options?
security = share has five "extra" steps to check the user,
perhaps it could be a delay from the backend (LDAP or winbind).
Kind regards,
I'm not sure what you mean by socket options. My smb.conf is shown below.
I'm not using LDAP or winbind. No domain, just a workgroup.
My smb.conf file is:
[global]
workgroup = MYWORKGROUP
netbios name = SERVER1
wins support = yes
domain master = yes
local master = yes
preferred master = yes
os level = 65
map to guest = Bad User
restrict anonymous = no
server signing = Auto
[test]
comment = test
path = /home/users
read only = no
guest ok = yes
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
