Markus/Filip

Thanks for the responses.

Markus

Where did you find the info regarding "it is a problem with digitally
signed connections which isn't supported by samba".  It would be nice to
know exactly what the problem was.  Is it a problem with SAMBA or with
W2k3, I wonder?

Is it something that is fixable or will it always be broken?

Does any one else know?

Filip

When you fixed it using CIFS was the client Linux and the host a W2k3 DC
using AD/kerberos etc.

Once agin thanks for the response.

Paul

Hi, I have posted the same question to the smb clients list but got no
answer. Basically, smbfs is pretty much unsupported. I eventually
upgraded to a 2.6 kernel and used cifs instead of smbfs. Worked without
any problems.

Here's a copy of my original mail & followup:

http://archive.netbsd.se/?ml=smb-clients&a=2005-10&t=1348952

I would still be interested in knowing what exactly is causing the
problem, since I have seen smbfs work with 2003 machines... Is it a
domain controller vs. non-domain controller thing ?

Regards,
Filip
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

-------------------------------------------------------------------
This email and any attachments transmitted with it are confidential (and 
potentially legally privileged) and intended solely for the use of the 
individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this 
email in error please notify the sender and do not store, copy or disclose the 
content to any other person.
It is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that opening this message 
and/or any of its attachments will not adversely affect its systems. No 
responsibility is accepted by the sender.
-------------------------------------------------------------------


--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Reply via email to