-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Joel,
Joel Franco wrote: | Empirically, when a NT based is added to the | existing network, the database application runs | slowly (access data) in this client machine | and in others NT machines that are added to the LAN. | | If i substitute this samba server with a Win2k3 | Standard Server, the application latency backs | to the original (or close), before the NT clients. | This was a big deception to me and since then, i'm | trying to find why this happens but i'm specialist. What version of Samba are you running? | I have observed in the ethereal sniffer that exists a | lot of "Locking AndX Request" and "Locking AndX Response" | that is highly "ping pong" communication between | the server and the client, that certainly don't | permit a good brute transfer. I understand that must | exist a lock mechanism to not corrupt the file | database shared between others stations. Most people running pc based database apps disable oplocks on the server. Can you run a quick test with and without oplocks in the Samba share. cheers, jerry ===================================================================== Alleviating the pain of Windows(tm) ------- http://www.samba.org GnuPG Key ----- http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc "There's an anonymous coward in all of us." --anonymous -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDi0vaIR7qMdg1EfYRAgIUAJ9jkPtfLkm+enDbZNH8nVFFx6I9WwCfQWfm h3PNQINCD70+Tu6/atQdPeA= =2Gjd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
