On 1/5/06, Gerald (Jerry) Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > This really boils down to a communication problem. Developers > are expected to subscribe to both the samba-cvs and the samba-technical > lists. The samba-pdbsql alias is really only intended for use in > bugzilla (default owner of pdb_sql component).
OK, bugzilla is probably the best place for discussion about several pdb*sql modules problems - it is public, so everyone can find if someone else works on some problem or tested it and so on. In a perfect world, everyone would know what's going on in > every aspect of the code tree. But that's doesn't scale very well. > It's a big code base. The only realy way to deal with this is to > eat our own dogfood. A simple small test server running the > SAMBA_3_0 tree (updated every few days or so). That way, when > something in the pdb*sql modules break, whether intentionally or > not, you will know immediately. At this moment I ca't have two small test servers - one for mysql and another for pgsql. So I can test code for mysql it it can compile and start, but I'm not able to test it for longer time. For pgsql I can do this. It will be great if for example Florian can test pdb_mysql more. Filip, you and I should stay in closer contact. I'll try to > remember to ping you when there is any relevant developments that > I think you should be aware of. OK, thanks a lot. I will look tomorrow and within weekend on current CVS code and I will try to tidy pdb_sql issues in bugzilla so we will know what is critical, what is already done etc. Cheers, Filip -- Filip Jirsák [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba